YCR / 2026

04argmax(project impact)

The problem comes before the model.

Explore six projects by domain. Each case study separates the question, data, method, and reported result—without filling gaps the résumés do not support.

6 projects ∈ portfolio

P01 / Accepted paper · ASONAM 2026

LLM Stance Perception

Women’s Safety Narratives

Measure how stance varies across large-scale social-media discussion of women’s-safety cases in India.

AIMachine LearningData EngineeringResearchData Science

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetRaw volume is reported as 4.3M+; its bar is a lower-bound approximation. Evaluation values are exact résumé figures.
4.3M+raw comments
351,501curated comments
0.7450macro-F1n = 3,000 held out
AcceptedASONAM 2026

16 cases · 2012–2024 · accuracy 0.7447 · MCC 0.6634

why

The analysis required a defensible bridge from millions of noisy comments to case-level statistical comparisons and a reproducible classification workflow.

data

4.3M+ raw Reddit and YouTube comments; 351,501 comments retained across 16 cases from 2012–2024.

method

Built the processing pipeline, tested distribution differences with Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, and G-tests, then adapted Qwen3.5-9B with LoRA for multi-class stance classification.

toolkit

Qwen3.5-9BLoRAMann–Whitney UChi-squareG-testsSLURM

result

  • 0.7447 accuracy
  • 0.7450 macro-F1
  • 0.6634 MCC
  • 3,000-sample held-out evaluation

note

High-confidence error analysis identified systematic model failure modes. The resulting short paper was accepted at ASONAM 2026.

P02 / Nearing completion

BayesV2G

Bayesian Variant-to-Gene Prioritization

Prioritize candidate causal genes for cardiometabolic traits from disease-associated variants.

ResearchData ScienceAnalytics

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetConnection widths are unscaled and represent architecture, not measured importance.
4evidence layers
P(V→G)posterior output
2baseline types
Nearing completionproject stage

GWAS · cis-eQTL · cis-pQTL · colocalization · cardiometabolic traits

why

Single-evidence and nearest-gene approaches do not express uncertainty across multiple molecular evidence layers.

data

GWAS, cis-eQTL, cis-pQTL, and colocalization evidence for cardiometabolic traits.

method

Estimate posterior variant-to-gene probabilities through uncertainty-aware evidence integration and compare them with nearest-gene and single-evidence baselines.

toolkit

Bayesian inferenceGWAScis-eQTLcis-pQTLColocalizationAblation analysis

result

  • Reproducible statistical-genetics pipeline
  • Sensitivity and ablation design
  • Baseline comparison framework

note

The project is described as nearing completion; no final performance metric is reported in the résumés.

P03 / Nearing completion

CoreGene-Bayes

Probabilistic Core-Gene Discovery

Identify candidate core disease genes by modeling convergence of genetic perturbations across molecular pathways.

ResearchData ScienceMachine Learning

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetNode positions and connections show workflow structure only; they do not encode measured magnitude.
3evidence families
Posterior membershipprimary output
2benchmark families
Nearing completionproject stage

Explicitly evaluates conflicting evidence and network-degree bias; no final performance result is claimed.

why

Network evidence can be informative while also carrying uncertainty, conflicting signals, and degree bias.

data

Molecular QTL evidence, Mendelian-randomization evidence, and gene-network information.

method

Estimate posterior core-gene membership and benchmark Bayesian prioritization against centrality and network-propagation approaches.

toolkit

Bayesian modelingMendelian randomizationMolecular QTLGene networksNetwork centrality

result

  • Uncertainty-aware comparison
  • Conflicting-evidence analysis
  • Network-degree bias evaluation

note

The project is described as nearing completion; no final performance metric is reported in the résumés.

P04 / Methodological development

NeuroMap-GWAS

Spatial Gene-Expression Mapping

Study where neurological disease-associated genes are expressed across human brain regions.

ResearchData ScienceAnalytics

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetDisease scope and study design only; no enrichment result is shown.
18diseases in scope
AHBAtranscriptomic source
Empirical nullsevaluation design
Method developmentproject stage

Includes Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s disease among the 18 conditions.

why

A cross-disease spatial view can test whether genetic susceptibility corresponds to regions affected by disease.

data

GWAS-associated genes and Allen Human Brain Atlas transcriptomic data across 18 neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases.

method

Design regional-enrichment tests with matched random gene sets and empirical null distributions.

toolkit

GWASTranscriptomicsMatched random setsEmpirical nullsEnrichment testing

result

  • Standardized 18-disease analysis design
  • Brain-region specificity framework

note

The résumés list Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s disease among the 18 conditions.

P05 / Applied AI project

SafeSpell

Harassment & Manipulation Detector

Detect emotionally manipulative and abusive language and present the findings in interpretable form.

AIMachine LearningAnalytics

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetConnection widths are unscaled and represent architecture, not measured importance.
2language-risk targets
Severity scorestructured output
FastAPI → Reactdelivery architecture
Applied AIproject type

Targets abusive and emotionally manipulative language; no evaluation metric is reported.

why

User-safety review needs structured severity signals instead of an opaque classification alone.

data

Text analyzed for abusive and emotionally manipulative language; the résumés do not name a source dataset.

method

Designed NLP pipelines for keyword detection and severity scoring, then exposed flagged content and trends through a dashboard.

toolkit

NLPKeyword detectionSeverity scoringFastAPIReactTailwind CSS

result

  • Python/FastAPI backend
  • Interactive review dashboard
  • Structured severity output

note

No date, evaluation metric, demo, or repository link is supplied in the résumés.

P06 / Machine-learning project

MindBill

Emotion-Aware Expense Analytics

Connect small daily purchases with user-labeled emotional outcomes such as regret, happy, and neutral.

Machine LearningAnalyticsData Science

Open interactive dashboard ↓

Project dashboard

Interactive evidence view

résumé-grounded
Preparing interactive view…
Interactive Plotly viewHover to inspect · drag to zoom · double-click to resetNode positions and connections show workflow structure only; they do not encode measured magnitude.
3emotion labels
2model families
Expense + emotionpaired input design
Regret trendsdashboard view

Regret · happy · neutral · Logistic Regression · Random Forest

why

Expense totals alone do not surface which purchase patterns repeatedly precede regret.

data

Micro-expense records paired with user-labeled emotions.

method

Cleaned and analyzed expense data, trained Logistic Regression and Random Forest models, and designed dashboards for regret trends and triggers.

toolkit

Logistic RegressionRandom ForestPythonReactTailwind CSS

result

  • Emotional-outcome prediction workflow
  • Regret-trend dashboard
  • Spending-trigger analysis

note

No date, evaluation metric, demo, or repository link is supplied in the résumés.